The Cost-Effectiveness of Reclassification Sampling for Prevalence Estimation

by Airat Bekmetjev, Dirk VanBruggen, Brian McLellan, Benjamin DeWinkle, Eric Lunderberg, Nathan Tintle

Background

Typically, a two-phase (double) sampling strategy is employed when classifications are subject to error and there is a gold standard (perfect) classifier available. Two-phase sampling involves classifying the entire sample with an imperfect classifier, and a subset of the sample with the gold-standard.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In this paper we consider an alternative strategy termed reclassification sampling, which involves classifying individuals using the imperfect classifier more than one time. Estimates of sensitivity, specificity and prevalence are provided for reclassification sampling, when either one or two binary classifications of each individual using the imperfect classifier are available. Robustness of estimates and design decisions to model assumptions are considered. Software is provided to compute estimates and provide advice on the optimal sampling strategy.

Conclusions/Significance

Reclassification sampling is shown to be cost-effective (lower standard error of estimates for the same cost) for estimating prevalence as compared to two-phase sampling in many practical situations.

For the full article visit: The Cost-Effectiveness of Reclassification Sampling for Prevalence Estimation
Syndicated from:PLoS ONE

Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.